Why Rebutting The LA’s R1 Response To Your Appeal Is Absolutely Essential For Tribunal

---

When a Local Authority submits their R1 response to SENDIST, many parents feel overwhelmed, discouraged, or even blindsided by the volume of inaccuracies, omissions, and tactical framing. But here’s the truth every parent advocate needs to know:

If you do not rebut the R1, the Tribunal may well treat the LA’s version of events as uncontested evidence.

That single fact changes everything.

The R1 Isn’t “Just Their View” It Becomes Evidence!

The moment the LA files their R1, it enters the Tribunal bundle as formal evidence. If you leave it unchallenged, the panel is entitled to assume:

• the LA’s statements are accurate
• their narrative reflects the facts
• their interpretation of the law is correct
• you agree with their position

And we both know that is rarely the case.

Local Authorities often rely on this silence. They know many parents don’t realise they have the right — and the power to rebut every incorrect claim. You do now!

A Rebuttal Protects Your Child’s Story From Being Rewritten

Your rebuttal is your opportunity to:

• Correct factual inaccuracies
• Expose omissions
• Highlight contradictions
• Challenge unlawful reasoning
• Re-centre the evidence on your child’s actual needs

Without this, the LA’s narrative becomes the default version of events. A rebuttal ensures the Tribunal sees the full picture, not a curated version designed to minimise provision.

Rebutting the R1 Strengthens Your Case – Powerfully

A well‑structured rebuttal does more than defend your position. It actively supports your case by:

1. Demonstrating credibility

Panels notice when a parent responds with clarity, evidence, and statutory accuracy. It shows you understand the process and are presenting a reasoned case.

2. Undermining the LA’s tactics

When you calmly and systematically dismantle inaccuracies, it exposes patterns:

• misrepresentation
• selective quoting
• reliance on outdated information
• unlawful thresholds
• internal contradictions

This damages the LA’s credibility far more than emotion ever could.

3. Directing the panel to the evidence that matters

Your rebuttal acts as a map. It tells the panel:

• what is wrong
• why it is wrong
• where the correct evidence sits in the bundle
• what the Tribunal should rely on instead

Panels appreciate this clarity.

4. Aligning your case with the legal tests

A strong rebuttal ties every correction back to:

• Section 36(8)
• Section 42
• Regulation 6
• Case law
• The Code of Practice

This is where your argument becomes not just persuasive, but legally compelling.

Rebuttal = Strategy, Not Emotion

You’re not arguing with the LA.
You’re not trying to convince them.
You’re building a Tribunal‑ready record that:

• protects your child
• exposes inaccuracies
• strengthens your evidence
• and ensures the panel sees the truth

A rebuttal is not optional.
It is a core part of your Tribunal strategy. If you would like support with this important step book here: Mentor Support

Local Authorities rely on parents not knowing the power of a rebuttal. They rely on silence. They rely on overwhelm.

But when you rebut the R1 with precision, evidence, and statutory grounding, you take control of the narrative and you protect your child from being misrepresented.

If you want support drafting or structuring your rebuttal, I’m right here.

For further information on the tribunal process the following will help:

Navigating the SEND Tribunal Process – SEN Parent Support Group

VLOG – What does Tribunal look like? – SEN Parent Support Group

VLOG: Working Document – SEN Parent Support Group

Working Document’s – HELP!!!! – SEN Parent Support Group

SEND45 Case Reviews! What Are They and How Do You Complete It… – SEN Parent Support Group