Friendships, Neurodiversity & School: What Our Community’s Data Finally Reveals

---

by SEN Parent Support Group

Friendships are often described as a “normal” part of childhood – something that just happens, something every child should have, something schools assume will fall into place. But for many neurodivergent (ND) children and young people, this simply isn’t the reality. Parents know it and children absolutely do feel it. Professionals suspect it but sadly nobody has ever asked the question openly, gathered the data, and documented the truth.

Until now.

This community poll – created by parents, answered by parents, and grounded in lived experience is the first time we’ve captured a clear picture of what friendships actually look like for ND and SEN children in school settings. Ten options. Five for diagnosed children. Five for undiagnosed. One brave question that finally puts numbers to what families have been saying for years.

Every response was given anonymously and treated with complete confidence. What follows is a breakdown of the findings, the themes emerging from parent comments, and what this means for schools, safeguarding, and SEND reform.

---

The Poll Categories

To understand the landscape properly, the poll separated children into two groups:

Diagnosed ND Children & Young People

• No in‑person friends
• 1 in‑person friend
• 2+ in‑person friends
• Friends both online and in person
• Only online friends

Undiagnosed Children & Young People

• No in‑person friends
• 1 in‑person friend
• 2+ in‑person friends
• Friends both online and in person
• Only online friends

This distinction matters. Many undiagnosed children have the same needs, the same barriers, and the same experiences as diagnosed children but without the recognition, support, or adjustments that could help them socially.

What the Data Shows

The results paint a picture that is both unsurprising and deeply concerning.

For diagnosed ND children:

• A significant proportion have no in‑person friendships at all.
• Many have only one in‑person friend – often a fragile or inconsistent connection.
• A smaller group have 2+ friends, but even within this group, parents report ongoing social challenges.
• Online friendships are a lifeline, providing safety, shared interests, and acceptance.
• A notable number rely entirely on online friendships.

For undiagnosed children:

• The pattern is similar – but even more stark.
• Many have no in‑person friendships, and no online friendships either.
• These children are often socially isolated and unsupported, because their needs are not formally recognised.
• Their experiences rarely appear in official data, yet they are some of the most vulnerable.

Across both groups, the message is clear:

ND children are disproportionately isolated in school environments. Friendships are not “naturally forming” for many ND pupils. Online spaces are often the only place they feel socially safe.

This is about environments that do not understand ND communication, sensory needs, or relational patterns and systems that repeatedly fail to protect ND children from social harm.

What Parents Shared

The additional comments from our SEND Parents added depth and emotional truth to the poll numbers.

1. Friendships come with a cost

Parents described children who do have friends, but are still regularly picked on, excluded, or targeted for being different. Friendship does not automatically equal safety.

2. Undiagnosed children are being overlooked

Parents highlighted that undiagnosed children often have no friendships and no support.
They are invisible in data, invisible in school systems, and invisible in safeguarding conversations.

3. Deep solidarity

Parents expressed grief, frustration, and relief that someone finally asked this question.
Many said they had never seen this issue acknowledged so openly.

Why This Matters for Schools

Schools often assume:

• “They’ll make friends eventually.”
• “They just need more confidence.”
• “They need to try harder socially.”
• “It’s normal for some children to struggle.”

But the data shows something very different.

This is systemic. Not incidental.

ND children are:

• more likely to be socially isolated
• more likely to be bullied
• more likely to be misunderstood
• more likely to rely on online friendships
• less likely to have consistent, reciprocal friendships in school

And undiagnosed children are at even greater risk.

This is a safeguarding issue.

Social isolation is linked to:

• anxiety
• depression
• school refusal
• masking
• self‑esteem difficulties
• vulnerability to exploitation
• long‑term mental health challenges

Friendship is not a “nice to have.” It is a protective factor.

Why This Matters for SEND Reform

This data provides something powerful:

• Evidence
• Lived experience
• Patterns across diagnosed and undiagnosed children
• A clear gap in current school practice
• A narrative that challenges the myth of “poor social skills”

It shows that ND children are not failing to make friends, schools are failing to create environments where ND friendships can form.

This is the message that needs to reach policymakers, local authorities, and education leaders.

This poll is more than numbers. It is the collective voice of parents who have watched their children struggle socially in environments that were never designed with them in mind.

By documenting this, we are not only validating families – we are creating a foundation for change.

Join us here: Closed Facebook Group

---

Articles that may be of interest:

Is Your Child EBSA? (Emotionally Based School Avoidant) – SEN Parent Support Grou

Don’t Wait: Trigger the Graduated Approach Or Watch Your Child Fall Behind – SEN Parent Support Group

Bridget Phillipson’s “This is What Progress Looks Like” Attendance Stats: Let’s Look Deeper! – SEN Parent Support Group

Why Schools Refuse to Start the EHCP Process — And What Parents Can Do Next – SEN Parent Support Group

Want to become a member of our Resource Hub with over 400 practical tools to support your SEND Educational Journey? Join here