Can The LA Reject S19 for Post 16?

by SEN Parent Support Group

Section 19 for Post‑16 – What Parents Need to Know!

There’s a lot of confusion about Section 19 once a young person turns 16  especially when they have EBSA, no exams, no attendance, or they’re stuck in the EHCP assessment process.
So here’s a clear breakdown for everyone in this situation.

First: Does Section 19 still apply after age 16?

Yes. Absolutely.
Local Authorities cannot leave a young person without education just because they’ve passed compulsory school age.

This applies whether they:

• have no EHCP yet,
• are in the EHCP needs assessment process, or
• already have an EHCP (draft or final).

If a young person cannot access education, the LA must step in.

---

When does Section 19 apply post‑16?

Section 19 kicks in when a young person is:

• Not attending due to EBSA, anxiety, disability, illness, or an unsafe/unsuitable placement
• Not receiving education for 15+ days (not necessarily consecutive)
• Unable to access exams or curriculum because needs aren’t met
• Waiting for an EHCP and currently without education
• In a named placement they cannot attend (even if the EHCP is new or not yet finalised)

The LA must provide suitable, full‑time education while they sort out the long‑term plan.

---

What if they don’t have an EHCP yet?

Section 19 still applies.

The LA cannot say:
“Wait for the EHCP”
or
“They’re post‑16 so it doesn’t apply.”

If the young person is out of education, the LA must provide interim education now, not after the EHCP is finished.

---

What if they do have an EHCP (draft or final)?

Section 19 still applies.

If the named placement is inaccessible for any reason — the LA must:

1. Provide interim education under Section 19
2. Review/amend the EHCP
3. Secure a lawful long‑term solution (including EOTAS if needed)

They cannot leave a young person with an EHCP sitting at home with nothing!!!

---

What counts as “suitable education”?

For post‑16, “suitable” means:

• Full‑time (unless medical evidence says otherwise)
• Matched to their age, ability, aptitude, and SEN
• Not generic tuition
• Not 3 hours a week
• Not worksheets
• Not “we’re trying to find something”

For young people with EHCPs, “suitable” must align with Section F.

---

Key Case Law

These are the cases that shut down the usual LA excuses:

1. R (G) v Westminster (2004)

LAs cannot leave a young person without education just because they’re over 16.

2. R (T) v Hackney (2011)

Section 19 applies when a young person is out of education due to illness, anxiety, disability, exclusion, or “otherwise” — including EBSA.

3. R (DS) v Wolverhampton (2017)

Education must be full‑time, unless medical evidence says otherwise.

4. R (J) v Worcestershire (2020)

The duty arises as soon as it’s clear the young person will miss education — not after 15 days.

5. R (LH) v Shropshire (2023)

Education must be suitable for the young person’s age, ability, aptitude, and SEN.

Ombudsman decisions (2022–2023)

Confirmed that Section 19 does apply post‑16, including for young people with EHCPs and those receiving EOTAS.

---

What this means for families right now

If your post‑16 young person:

• has EBSA
• hasn’t been in school/college for months
• didn’t sit exams
• is waiting for an EHCP
• has a draft EHCP
• has a final EHCP but can’t attend
• is in a placement that cannot meet need
• is at home with nothing

The LA has a legal duty to provide education under Section 19.

They cannot wait for:

• the EHCP to finish
• a placement to be found
• a panel meeting
• a medical letter
• the young person to “engage”
• the next term

The duty is immediate.

If your young person is post‑16 and out of education, you are not “waiting your turn” or “in limbo”.
The law is clear:
The LA must provide suitable education now, and they must amend the EHCP or secure a lawful alternative.

Check out the blue hyperlinks within the post to read more or search within our Resource Hub or The SEND Bible™ under Section 19!

---